04-03-2015, 03:02 PM
I don't want to make things more complicate but just a little remark about the miller200 <-> no-chicane layout:
Imho the miller200 has less effective (smaller, harder to spot) visual reference marks for break-points, especially before T4 (and I think T2 as well, not exactly sure).
This shouldn't be a problem in FP/Q but maybe in the heat of the race...
T4 no-chicane: http://simracing.in.ua/uploads/posts/200...ohio03.jpg
T4 miller200: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2U7dfTfDdE&t=42
But these are just my thoughts. I'm ok with both layouts. After all it's a fantastic track with a nice flow!
Imho the miller200 has less effective (smaller, harder to spot) visual reference marks for break-points, especially before T4 (and I think T2 as well, not exactly sure).
This shouldn't be a problem in FP/Q but maybe in the heat of the race...
T4 no-chicane: http://simracing.in.ua/uploads/posts/200...ohio03.jpg
T4 miller200: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2U7dfTfDdE&t=42
But these are just my thoughts. I'm ok with both layouts. After all it's a fantastic track with a nice flow!